Decision No 368 of 5 July 2022
on the exception of unconstitutionality of the phrase “in urban areas” contained in Article 2 (27) of Law No 61/1991 for sanctioning violations of certain norms of social coexistence, of public order and peace
on the exception of unconstitutionality of the phrase “in urban areas” contained in Article 2 (27) of Law No 61/1991 for sanctioning violations of certain norms of social coexistence, of public order and peace
on the objection of unconstitutionality of the Law on the transfer of immovable property intended for sanitary-veterinary assistance activities, owned by the State, from the management of the State Domains Agency in the management of local councils, and for the… Read moreDecision No 367 of 29 June 2022
on the objection of unconstitutionality of the Law amending and supplementing Law No 45/2009 on the organisation and operation of the “Gheorghe Ionescu-Şişeşti” Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences and the research and development system in the fields of agriculture,… Read moreDecision No 366 of 29 June 2022
on the objection of unconstitutionality of the Law amending Government Ordinance No 2/2001 on the legal regime of administrative offences and Law No 286/2009 on the Criminal Code
on the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of Article 170 (1) (b) of the National Education Law No 1/2011
on the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of Article 100 of Law No 303/2004 on the Statute of Judges and Prosecutors
on the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of Article 52 (3), of the phrase “except for the case provided in paragraph (6)” referred to in Article 57 (5) and of Article 57 (6) of Law No 302/2004 on international… Read moreDecision No 359 of 26 May 2022
regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of Article 155 (1) of the Criminal Code
on the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of Article 248 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Code, as well as of the phrase “takes the necessary measures to carry out a psychiatric forensic expertise, if this has not been done… Read moreDecision No 357 of 26 May 2022
on the exception of unconstitutionality of the phrase “as well as following final conviction for having committed an intentional criminal offence, likely to harm the prestige of the profession” in the final phrase of Article 38 (2) of Government Ordinance… Read moreDecision No 356 of May 26, 2022